Directors and officers (D&O) and errors and omissions (E&O) policies often contain “capacity” limitations, which restrict coverage to claims against the insured alleging acts undertaken by the insured in his or her insured...more
On December 9, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York considered whether an “insured v. insured” (IvI) exclusion applied to bar coverage for an underlying lawsuit brought against insureds under a...more
On March 3, 2021, the Supreme Court of Delaware issued a significant decision in the D&O coverage space, RSUI Indemnity Co. v. Murdock, analyzing whether fraud claims against insureds were covered under an excess D&O policy...more
On August 26, 2019, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, applying Florida Law, held that ill-gotten gains do not constitute covered “loss” within the meaning of a D&O policy. In Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Sabal...more
11/19/2019
/ Appeals ,
Aviation Industry ,
Billing Rates ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Corporate Executives ,
D&O Insurance ,
Denial of Insurance Coverage ,
Grand Theft ,
Indemnification ,
Insurance Claims ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insurance Regulations ,
Municipalities ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Policy Terms ,
Premiums ,
Regulatory Violations ,
Reservation of Rights ,
Settlement Agreements ,
Summary Judgment ,
Workers' Compensation Claim ,
Wrongful Acts
“Related Claims” provisions in directors and officers (D&O) and errors and omissions (E&O) policies, while common, can spawn disagreement as to scope and application. ...more
Policyholders often obtain both errors and omissions (E&O) and directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance policies because they provide complementary coverage. ...more