Latest Posts › Patents

Share:

Presence of Servers Alone Does Not Establish Venue

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has now held that a “place of business” for purposes of the patent venue statute requires an employee or agent of the defendant to be conducting business at that place. In light...more

Key Takeaways from MWE International Seminar Intellectual Property Session – January 2020

On January 21 and 22, 2020, the 8th annual McDermott International Seminars took place in Osaka and Tokyo. These seminars focused on cross-border M&A, GDPR, intellectual property, global enforcement and other key topics....more

No Brainer: Summary Judgment Based on Non-Asserted Grounds Procedurally Improper

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s summary judgment grant of non-infringement because it was improperly granted on a ground that was not asserted by the accused infringer. NeuroGrafix...more

Breach of Contract Claim Does Not Arise Under Patent Law

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court decision that retained jurisdiction over a breach of contract action, finding that the action did not sufficiently implicate issues of patent law and...more

IPR Time-Bar Clock Starts Ticking on Service of Complaint, Even if Deficient

In a precedential decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) dismissed a petition for inter partes review (IPR), finding that the one-year time limit for filing an IPR petition under 35 USC § 315(b) is triggered even...more

No Motivation to Combine Where There Is No Reasonable Expectation of Success

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) non-obviousness determination because substantial evidence supported the PTAB’s finding that a person of skill in the art would...more

No Transfer Under First-to-File Rule Where Second Case Involves Different Technology

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting transfer of a patent infringement case, finding that the “first-to-file” rule did not warrant transfer because, even though...more

A Window into PTAB Derivation Proceedings

In the first-ever final written decision in a post-American Invents Act (AIA) derivation proceeding, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) found that the petitioner had not shown that an inventor named in the respondent’s...more

Still Open for Discussion: Venue Based on Presence of Servers

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit elected not to decide en banc whether servers or similar equipment in third-party facilities constitute a regular and established place of business under the patent venue...more

The Wild, Wild WesternGeco: Reasonable Royalties and Lost Profits

Following remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the impact of an intervening invalidation of four of six patent claims in issue by the Patent Trial and...more

Federal Circuit Law Governs Waiver or Forfeiture of Patent Venue Rights

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded venue was improper under the patent venue statute as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States, finding that the accused infringer did not waive or forfeit...more

Supreme Court to Address Whether Government Can Petition for AIA Post-Grant Review

The Supreme Court of the United States granted, in part, Return Mail’s petition for certiorari to address whether the federal government has standing to challenge patents using post-grant proceedings under the America Invents...more

Federal Circuit Clarifies Role of Consumer Demand in Terms of Entire Market Value

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a patent holder’s petition for rehearing en banc but issued a modified opinion finding that to invoke the entire market value rule, the patent holder must show that the...more

10/25/2018  /  Damages , Fair Market Value , Patents

Entire Market Value Rule: Patented Feature Must Be Sole Driver for Consumer Demand

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a jury’s damages award, finding that the entire market value rule could not be used to calculate damages since the patented feature did not drive demand for the product....more

Tribal Immunity Does Not Apply to IPR Proceedings

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) finding that tribal immunity does not apply to inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan...more

Supreme Court to Consider Whether Confidential Sale Triggers On-Sale Bar

The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider the question of whether, under the America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as...more

Petitioner Has Standing when Injury Is Imminent

While reversing a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision that confirmed the validity of a patent, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that a post-grant review (PGR) petitioner has Article III standing...more

Federal Circuit Continues Trend of Strict Adherence to Language of Patent Venue Statute

In a series of decisions, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit continued its trend of strict adherence to § 1400(b) when analyzing proper venue for patent infringement actions under the Supreme Court of the United...more

Foreign Lost Profits Recoverable from the US Supplier

The United States Supreme Court issued a decision in WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. holding that a patent owner may recover lost foreign profits for infringement under § 271(f) of the Patent Act because it is a...more

Tribal Sovereign Immunity Does Not Apply to IPR

In a matter of first impression, the Patent and Trial Appeal Board (PTAB) denied a Native American tribe’s motion to terminate a finding that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply to inter partes review (IPR) proceedings....more

Concrete Solution to Computer Problem Is Patent Eligible

Affirming a series of district court rulings, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found claims directed to software menus that display a limited subset of commonly used functions—useful in conserving space on...more

Got the Message: PTAB Doesn’t Have to Construe Claim Term

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision, finding that the PTAB did not need to explicitly construe a claim term. HTC Corp. v. Cellular Communications Equipment,...more

Looking Back: TC Heartland Is a Change of Law

In remanding a case back to the district court, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the Supreme Court of the United States’ 2017 decision in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods qualifies as a change of law, and...more

PTO Implements Attorney Discipline Diversion Program

The US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) initiated a two-year Diversion Pilot Program to align its attorney discipline program with the practices of more than 30 states. The program is designed to give patent and trademark...more

Secondary Considerations Transformed into Rebuttal Evidence

Addressing the issue of prima facie obviousness, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that evidence of secondary considerations failed to overcome a strong showing of obviousness....more

82 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide