Latest Posts › Patent Infringement

Share:

U.S. IP Update – June 2025

Sterne Kessler’s U.S. IP Update is a newsletter delivering the latest developments in U.S. intellectual property law, tailored for companies and legal counsel in Korea. Stay informed on key court decisions, policy changes,...more

Patent Licensing & Standing: A.L.M. Holding Co. v. Zydex Indus. Private Ltd. (D. Del. Nov. 25, 2024)

In the United States, a plaintiff must have standing to bring suit in U.S. courts. For patent cases, this means that for a plaintiff to have constitutional standing, the plaintiff must show that it has “an exclusionary right...more

Federal Circuit IP Appeals: Summaries of Key 2023 Decisions (8th Edition): In re: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, 85 F.4th 1148...

PersonalWeb—the third appeal from a multidistrict litigation involving alleged infringement of PersonalWeb’s patents—addressed two issues: (1) whether the district court abused its discretion in finding the case exceptional...more

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2022 Decisions

As part of the recovery from the global COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit took steps to return to normal operations. It began requiring live oral arguments in August 2022 and, by November,...more

2/8/2023  /  § 314(d) , § 315(b) , 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(1) , Abuse of Discretion , Administrative Patent Judges , Administrative Procedure Act , America Invents Act , Anticipation , Apple , Appointments Clause , Arbitrary and Capricious , Arthrex Inc v Smith & Nephew Inc , Article III , Artificial Intelligence , Broadcom , Burden of Persuasion , Burden of Production , Confidentiality Agreements , Consent Order , Constitutional Challenges , Covenant Not to Sue , Director of the USPTO , Doctrine of Equivalents , Estoppel , Evidence , Ex Partes Reexamination , Expert Testimony , Failure To Disclose , Federal Vacancies Reform Act , Final Written Decisions , Forum Selection , Google , Indefiniteness , Intel , Intellectual Property Litigation , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , International Trade Commission (ITC) , Inventions , Inventors , Joint Inventors , Jurisdiction , Lack of Jurisdiction , Likelihood of Confusion , Motion to Amend , Motion to Terminate , Obviousness , Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP) , Parallel Proceedings , Patent Act , Patent Applications , Patent Infringement , Patent Invalidity , Patent Litigation , Patent Prosecution , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patent-Eligible Subject Matter , Patents , Post-Grant Review , Preliminary Injunctions , Preponderance of the Evidence , Prior Art , Qualcomm , Real Party in Interest , Remand , Section 101 , Section 112 , Separation of Powers , Standing , Statutory Authority , Sua Sponte , Substantial Evidence , Testimony , Time-Barred Claims , Trademark Application , Trademark Infringement , Trademark Litigation , Trademark Registration , Trademark Trial and Appeal Board , Trademarks , USPTO , Vacated , Written Descriptions

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2021 Decisions

[co-author: Jamie Dohopolski] Last year, the continued global COVID-19 pandemic forced American courts to largely continue the procedures set in place in 2020. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was no...more

2/9/2022  /  § 314(d) , 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(1) , Absolute Intervening Rights Doctrine , Abuse of Discretion , Administrative Patent Judges , Administrative Procedure Act , America Invents Act , Appeals , Appointments Clause , Arbitrary and Capricious , Article of Manufacture , Assignor Estoppel , Burden of Proof , Claim Construction , Collateral Estoppel , Commercial Success , Confidential Information , Constitutional Challenges , Demand Letter , Denial of Institution , Design Patent , Director of the USPTO , Dismissals , Doctrine of Prosecution Disclaimer , Due Process , Equitable Estoppel , Estoppel , Evidence , Ex Partes Reexamination , Executive Branch , Executive Powers , Federal Rules of Evidence , Final Written Decisions , Forum Selection , FRCP 52(c) , GATT , Inferior Officers , Intellectual Property Litigation , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Reexamination , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , International Trade Commission (ITC) , Intervening Acts , Inventions , Issue Preclusion , Judicial Review , Lack of Authority , Lack of Jurisdiction , Likelihood of Success , Minerva Surgical Inc. v Hologic Inc. , Motion for Summary Judgment , Motivation to Combine , Nexus , Non-Disclosure Agreement , Nonobvious , Obviousness , Ornamental Design , Parallel Proceedings , Patent Applications , Patent Filings , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patent Prosecution , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patent Validity , Patents , Petition for Writ of Certiorari , Pharmaceutical Patents , Post-Grant Review , Pre-GATT , Preliminary Injunctions , Principle Officers , Printed Publications , Prior Art , Real Party in Interest , Remand , Reversal , Rule 36 , Scope of Review , SCOTUS , Section 325(d) , Sua Sponte , Substantial Evidence , Totality of Evidence , United States v Arthrex Inc , USPTO , Vacated , Writ of Mandamus

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2020 Decisions: Adidas AG v. Nike, Inc., 963 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir....

Adidas petitioned for inter partes reviews (IPR) of two Nike patents. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board concluded that Adidas had not met its burden to show that the challenged claims in Nike’s patents were obvious. Adidas...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide