Latest Publications

Share:

For the Record: Cyber Coverage “For” a Security Breach is Ambiguous under New Mexico Law

The New Mexico Court of Appeals has held that cyber policy language affording coverage “for” a security breach was ambiguous and must be construed broadly to provide coverage for a breach of contract claim “because of,”...more

Coverage for Post-Tender Remediation Costs Precluded as Voluntary Payments Where Insured Admitted and Assumed Liability Before...

A federal district court, applying New York law, has held that a “voluntary payments provision” precluded coverage for an insured’s post-tender costs to remediate its engineering errors because the insured admitted and...more

New Jersey Appellate Court Affirms Rescission of Policies Based on Law Firm’s Misrepresentation in Applications

In a win for Wiley’s client, a New Jersey appellate court, applying New Jersey law, affirmed a trial court’s decision rescinding four lawyer’s professional liability policies because of material misrepresentations made in the...more

Bodily Injury Exclusion in E&O Policy Bars Coverage Under New York Law

In a win for Wiley’s client, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, applying New York law, has held that a bodily injury exclusion bars coverage under an errors and omissions policy for...more

Lawsuit Deemed Related to Notice of Circumstances Submitted During Prior Claims-Made Policy Period Under Florida’s “Sufficient...

The United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, applying Florida law, has held that an investor’s lawsuit against an attorney related back to a notice of a potential claim submitted during the earlier...more

No Coverage under Commercial Liability Policy for Penalties and Costs Incurred Administering Employee Benefit Plan

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, applying Georgia law, has held that a commercial liability policy covering “sums that the ‘insured’ becomes legally obligated to pay as damages” provides...more

Applicability of Insured v. Insured Exclusion Can Be Determined By Reference to Complaint Alone

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana has held that an insured v. insured exclusion barred coverage for a lawsuit brought in the name of a music fraternity against its president and executive...more

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Decision Below in Favor of Insurers, Holds “Relatedness” is Determined By Policy Language and Not...

In a win for Wiley Rein’s client, the Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed the trial court’s decision that a securities class action and an opt-out case constitute related Claims, such that the opt-out case is excluded from...more

Legal Malpractice Lawsuit Not Covered Where Insured Knew or Reasonably Should Have Known Pre-Inception of Conduct that Might Be...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, applying North Dakota law, has held that a lawyers professional liability policy did not provide coverage for a legal malpractice lawsuit where the insured knew or...more

$140 million SEC Disgorgement Payment Not a “Penalty” and Insurable Under New York Law

The New York Court of Appeals has held that a $140 million disgorgement payment in an SEC settlement is not a non-covered “penalty” under a professional liability policy. According to the court, the payment had compensatory...more

Exception to Insured v. Insured Exclusion for “Any Claim Brought by” Certain Former Directors Does Not Apply to Restore Coverage...

In a win for Wiley’s client, the California Superior Court has held that an exception to an insured v. insured exclusion for “any Claim brought by any director . . . of a Company who has not served in such capacity . . . for...more

Sexual Misconduct Exclusion Bars E&O Coverage for Title IX Claim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that a sexual misconduct exclusion unambiguously barred errors and omissions coverage for a Title IX claim as a matter of Illinois law. Netherlands Ins. Co....more

Delaware Superior Court Holds Opt-Out Case is “Fundamentally Identical” to Original Securities Class Action First Made Before...

In a win for Wiley Rein’s client, the Delaware Superior Court has held that an opt-out securities case related back to the original securities class action because the cases were “based on the same subject, have a causal...more

Derivative Exception to Insured v. Insured Exclusion Applies Only to Derivative Suits Brought by Non-Insureds

An Oklahoma federal court has held that a derivative exception to an Insured v. Insured (IvI) exclusion applied only to derivative lawsuits brought by non-insureds, and did not save coverage for a direct claim filed by an...more

New York Insurance Law Does Not Preclude Enforcement of Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy’s Notice Requirements

The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division has held that, under New York Insurance Law § 3420(a)(5), an insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify a personal injury action where the insured failed to provide notice of the...more

Illinois Court Holds Fee Dispute Does Not Involve Professional Services

An Illinois appellate court has held that an underlying action involving a fee dispute was not a claim involving professional services and was not covered under a professional liability policy.  RLI Ins. Co. v. Acclaim Res....more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide