Bailey Sanders

Irwin IP LLP

+ Follow Contact

Latest Posts › Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Share:

No Rhythm, No Review: USPTO Director Skips a Beat on IPRs.

iRhythm Technologies, Inc., v. Welch Allyn, Inc., IPR2025-00363, IPR2025-00374, IPR2025-00376, IPR2025-00377, IPR2025-00378 (P.T.A.B. June 6, 2025) - On June 6, 2025, United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)...more

6/25/2025 / Director of the USPTO , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , Obviousness , Patent Invalidity , Patent Litigation , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patents , Statutory Interpretation , USPTO

Cut! GoPro Can’t Keep Cameras Rolling After IPR Estoppel.

Contour IP Holdings, LLC, v. GoPro, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-04738-WHO (N.D. Cal. March 24, 2025) - The estoppel provision of the American Invents Act (AIA) (35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2)) prevents a petitioner in an inter parties...more

5/1/2025 / America Invents Act , Estoppel , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , Jurisdiction , Obviousness , Patent Invalidity , Patent Litigation , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Prior Art , Statutory Interpretation

Maybe The Third Time Is The Charm After All.

Nokia of America Corp. v. Alexander Soto and Walter Soto, IPR2023-00680, IPR2023-00681, IPR2023-00682 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 3, 2024) - On December 3, 2024, USPTO Director Kathi Vidal, for a second time, granted Director Review...more

12/23/2024 / Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , Patent Litigation , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patents , USPTO

3 Results

View per page

Page: of 1