Latest Posts › First Amendment

Share:

Post-SCOTUS District Court Ruling in Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products Reshapes Trademark Dilution Jurisprudence

Background and Supreme Court Decision - As previously reported, in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. 140 (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified a crucial boundary in trademark law: when an...more

Trademark Trouble: When the F-Word Fails to Function

Recent Supreme Court decisions underscore how viewpoint-based refusals of trademark applications are unconstitutional. But can these viewpoint-based refusals survive under the "failure-to-function" doctrine instead?...more

Supreme Court: You Can Trademark Whatever the ®®®® You Want (Maybe?)

The Immoral and Scandalous Bar to Trademark Registration is Unconstitutional - On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court's decision in Iancu v. Brunetti, 588 U.S. __ (2019), struck down the Lanham Act's ban on registering...more

Free Speech Protects Disparaging Trademarks: Band's Trademark Case May Be Good News for Football's Redskins

The U.S. Supreme Court held today that the "disparagement clause" of the Lanham Act is unconstitutional, a decision that likely settles the question of whether the Redskins football team's trademarks are registrable amidst...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide