In a contentious 5–2 decision, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has dealt an unprecedented blow to the state’s business and manufacturing sector by ruling that the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) can force cleanup of PFAS...more
7/9/2025
/ Department of Natural Resources ,
Enforcement Actions ,
Environmental Litigation ,
Groundwater ,
Hazardous Substances ,
Judicial Authority ,
Manufacturers ,
PFAS ,
Regulatory Authority ,
Rulemaking Process ,
Site Remediation ,
State and Local Government ,
Statutory Interpretation ,
WI Supreme Court
On May 12, 2025, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an interim final rule significantly extending the reporting deadlines for PFAS reporting under Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)....more
5/20/2025
/ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Filing Deadlines ,
Final Rules ,
Imports ,
Manufacturers ,
PFAS ,
Popular ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Reporting Requirements ,
Small Business ,
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
On May 14, 2025, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under Administrator Lee Zeldin, announced its decision to retain the national enforceable drinking water standards for two of the most scrutinized per- and...more
A recent lawsuit against Synagro Technologies, Inc. raises important questions about the role of biosolids in PFAS contamination and the legal responsibilities of manufacturers. The case, Farmer v. Synagro Tech., Inc., No....more
On October 11, 2023, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published in the Federal Register a final rule, under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), that establishes reporting requirements for manufacturers of...more