The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in a full en banc decision, raised the pleading and proof standards for plaintiffs seeking to certify multistate automotive defect class actions. The court’s June 27, 2025,...more
7/7/2025
/ Appeals ,
Appellate Courts ,
Article III ,
Automotive Industry ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Consumer Protection Laws ,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ,
Fraud ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Manufacturers ,
Product Defects ,
State Law Claims
Extending the United States Supreme Court’s decision in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, 138 S.Ct. 1800 (2018), the California Court of Appeal has held that a plaintiff cannot “stack” multiple class actions to extend the...more
In a case of first impression in the Third Circuit, the Court of Appeals held that unnamed, putative class members are not required to establish standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. Rather, the Court held that...more
7/27/2015
/ Antitrust Litigation ,
Appeals ,
Article III ,
Class Action ,
Comcast ,
Comcast v. Behrend ,
Design Defects ,
FRCP 23(b)(3) ,
Prudential Insurance ,
Putative Class Actions ,
SCOTUS ,
Standing ,
Tyson Foods ,
Tyson Foods v Bouaphakeo ,
Volvo