On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp., 606 U.S. —- — S.Ct. —- 2025 WL 1716136 (2025), addressing whether, under the Administrative Orders Review...more
7/1/2025
/ Administrative Procedure Act ,
Consent ,
FCC ,
Hobbs Act ,
Judicial Review ,
Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo ,
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates Inc v McKesson Corporation ,
Robocalling ,
SCOTUS ,
Statutory Interpretation ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Telemarketing
In a significant ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered its 6-3 opinion in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, addressing the scope of judicial review under the Hobbs Act. The decision marks a...more
6/23/2025
/ Administrative Procedure Act ,
Appeals ,
Class Action ,
Enforcement Actions ,
FCC ,
Hobbs Act ,
Judicial Review ,
Jurisdiction ,
McKesson Technologies ,
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates Inc v McKesson Corporation ,
SCOTUS ,
Statutory Interpretation ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Unsolicited Faxes
Last month, we discussed the motion filed by the National Consumers League and four small business owners to intervene in the case of Insurance Marketing Coalition Limited. v. FCC. This motion aimed to challenge the Eleventh...more
3/25/2025
/ Amicus Briefs ,
Appeals ,
ATDS ,
Consumer Protection Laws ,
En Banc Review ,
FCC ,
Final Rules ,
Lead Generators ,
Motion To Intervene ,
Prior Express Consent ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Robocalling ,
State Attorneys General ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Telemarketing
In Insurance Marketing Coalition Ltd. v. FCC, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 289152 (11th Cir. Jan. 24, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit came to the rescue of the lead generation industry, striking down new...more
2/7/2025
/ Administrative Proceedings ,
Consent ,
Consumer Protection Laws ,
Do Not Call List ,
FCC ,
Judicial Authority ,
Lead Generators ,
Privacy Laws ,
Robocalling ,
Statutory Interpretation ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Telemarketing
In a previous post, we discussed the oral arguments held on December 18, 2024, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the case of Insurance Marketing Coalition Limited (IMC) v. Federal Communications...more
1/27/2025
/ Consent ,
Enforcement Actions ,
FCC ,
Final Rules ,
Lead Generators ,
Regulatory Agenda ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Robocalling ,
Stays ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Telemarketing
On December 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held oral arguments in Insurance Marketing Coalition Limited (IMC) v. Federal Communication Commission (FCC), which challenges the FCC’s December 2023 order...more
On June 29, 2023, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking clarifying how consumers may revoke consent to receive calls or texts under the Telephone Consumer Protection...more
Do the text messages that Facebook sends to your phone with birthday reminders violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)? According to the Ninth Circuit in a recent decision, the answer is no because users provided...more
Do text messages sent by a chatbot fall within the provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibiting unsolicited calls made using an “artificial or prerecorded voice?” According to the United States...more
On October 12, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision, reversing the dismissal of a lawsuit on the grounds that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) does not extend to unwanted business texts. In Chennette v. Porch.com,...more
Escalating efforts to crack down on illegal robocalls, state attorneys general announced on August 2 that they have established a nationwide Anti-Robocall Litigation Task Force. The task force comprises attorneys general from...more
In late June 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California gave final approval for a $2.5 million class-action settlement in Johnson v. Moss Brothers Auto Group to resolve claims brought against a motor...more
On March 24, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, upholding separate district court decisions finding that a system that sends promotional text messages to phone numbers randomly selected from a database of...more
In a succinct, emphatic opinion issued on January 19, the Ninth Circuit quietly rejected one of the last remaining arguments made by plaintiffs attempting to neutralize the Supreme Court’s decisive Facebook opinion...more
Companies are continuing to reap the rewards of the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook v. Duguid earlier this year, in which the Supreme Court confirmed a narrow reading of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (TCPA)...more
In its August 31 opinion, the Northern District of California rejected the plaintiff’s “Footnote Seven” argument in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case, adding to the chorus of courts requiring TCPA plaintiffs to...more
On September 1, 2020, a district court in the Northern District of California weighed in on an issue of recurring importance in internet commerce: how does a business obtain a remote consumer’s effective agreement to terms...more
9/9/2020
/ Arbitration ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
E-Commerce ,
Hyperlink ,
Motion to Compel ,
Putative Class Actions ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Telemarketing ,
Terms and Conditions ,
Text Messages