As we blogged earlier this week, the death of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on February 13 has sent shockwaves throughout the halls of power in Washington, D.C. The balance within the U.S. Supreme Court between...more
EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc. is a key case for all employers.
We have been tracking the developments in this case since its inception. Now it has reached the U.S. Supreme Court on the issue of whether attorneys’...more
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Mach Mining v. EEOC, 135 S.Ct. 1645 (2015), which held that a judge may review whether the EEOC satisfied its statutory obligation to attempt conciliation before filing...more
In an order recently issued in EEOC v Jetstream Ground Services, Inc., Case No. 13-CV-02340 (D. Colo. Sept. 29, 2015), Judge Christine Arguello of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado ruled that the EEOC had...more
10/9/2015
/ Conciliation ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Disparate Treatment ,
Dress Codes ,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ,
Estoppel ,
Exhaustion Doctrine ,
Genuine Issue of Material Fact ,
Hiring & Firing ,
Judicial Review ,
Laches ,
Muslims ,
Popular ,
Protected Activity ,
Religious Accommodation ,
Religious Discrimination ,
Sex Discrimination ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Summary Judgment ,
Title VII ,
Undue Burden