CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In a published opinion issued December 24, 2018, Sierra Club v. County of Fresno, Case No. S219783, the California Supreme Court determined that an...more
1/9/2019
/ Abuse of Discretion ,
Air Quality Standards ,
Appeals ,
CA Supreme Court ,
CEQA ,
Construction Industry ,
Construction Project ,
De Novo Standard of Review ,
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ,
Judicial Review ,
Mitigation ,
Public Agencies ,
Public Health ,
Real Estate Development ,
Standard of Review
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In a published opinion issued May 1, 2018, Jensen v. City of Santa Rosa, Case. No. SCV255347, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial...more
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In an unpublished opinion issued May 31, 2018, Save Adelaida v. County of San Luis Obispo, Case No. B279285, the California Court of Appeal...more
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In an unpublished opinion issued January 31, 2018, Citizens for Open & Public Participation v. City of Montebello, Case No. B277060, the California...more
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In a partially published opinion issued April 4, 2018, Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute v. City and County of San Francisco, Case...more
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In an unpublished opinion issued May 18, 2018, Responsible Development for Water Tank Hill v. County of San Mateo, Case No. A150883, the California...more
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In an unpublished opinion issued February 20, 2018, Advocates for Better Cmty. Dev. v. City of Palm Springs, Case No. E066193, the California Court...more
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development
In a partially published opinion issued January 12, 2018, City of Long Beach v. City of Los Angeles, the California Court of Appeal affirmed in part...more