Daniel Blynn

Venable LLP

+ Follow Contact

Latest Posts › Standing

Share:

How a Recent FACTA Decision Impacts the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act's Standing Analysis

Several years ago, in Salcedo v. Hanna, the Eleventh Circuit held that the receipt of a single allegedly unsolicited, autodialed text message was not a concrete enough injury-in-fact to establish Article III standing for a...more

7/18/2022 / Article III , Auto-Dialed Calls , FACTA , FL Supreme Court , Injury-in-Fact , Putative Class Actions , Standing , TCPA , Text Messages

First Florida Telephone Solicitation Act Dismissal Decision Issues, and It Has Virtually Nothing to Do with the Statute

There have been scores of Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (FTSA) class actions filed since July 1, 2021, when the statute was amended to provide for a private right of action; the Florida legislature thinks that number may...more

3/14/2022 / Article III , Dismissals , Standing , TCPA , Telephone Sales , Voicemail

Did a Prolific TCPA Plaintiffs’ Attorney Just Argue That the Statute Does Not Regulate Text Messaging? The Hearing Transcript Says...

For years, the plaintiffs’ bar has been filing Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class actions alleging the receipt of unsolicited, autodialed text messages. But the TCPA’s autodialer prohibition explicitly refers to...more

3/11/2022 / Article III , Auto-Dialed Calls , Class Action , Injury-in-Fact , Standing , State Law Claims , TCPA , Telephone Sales , Text Messages

3 Results

View per page

Page: of 1