The California Senate recently passed a bill, SB 682, that would essentially eliminate the use of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals,” in food packaging within the state, as of January...more
8/7/2025
/ California ,
Compliance ,
Department of Toxic Substances Control ,
Manufacturers ,
New Legislation ,
PFAS ,
Popular ,
Product Packaging ,
Public Health ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
State Legislatures ,
Toxic Chemicals
The California Senate’s Environmental Quality Committee recently passed, as amended, SB 682, and referred the bill to the Senate Committee on Health for a further hearing. If ultimately enacted as law, SB 682 would result in...more
If the first two waves of PFAS litigation focused on impacts to natural resources—namely groundwater—and personal injury claims alleging exposure to PFAS, the third wave of PFAS litigation has certainly arrived.
Originally...more
11/26/2024
/ Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) ,
Consumer Protection Laws ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Environmental Litigation ,
Manufacturers ,
Negligent Misrepresentation ,
PFAS ,
Proposition 65 ,
Reporting Requirements ,
Supply Chain ,
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Proposition 65 requires “clear and reasonable” warnings in California for products containing chemicals on the State’s list of substances causing cancer and/or reproductive toxicity. As of January 2021, THC is a listed...more
2/26/2021
/ Cannabidiol (CBD) oil ,
Cannabis Products ,
Cannabis-Related Businesses (CRBs) ,
Continuing Legal Education ,
Dispensaries ,
Distributors ,
Hemp ,
Hemp Related Businesses ,
Manufacturers ,
Marijuana ,
Marijuana Related Businesses ,
Notice of Violation ,
Proposition 65 ,
Retailers ,
Warning Labels ,
Webinars