On August 11, 2025, the Federal Circuit reversed the District of Utah’s ruling that all but one of the claims in PowerBlock Holdings, Inc.’s U.S. Patent No. 7,578,771 were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. PowerBlock Holdings,...more
The Federal Circuit recently reversed a $4.7M verdict in a patent lawsuit involving two patents concerning next-generation sequencing methods—U.S. Patent Nos. 10,017,810 and 10,450,597. Both patents concern DNA preparation...more
8/21/2025
/ Appeals ,
Appellate Courts ,
Biotechnology ,
CAFC ,
Claim Construction ,
Doctrine of Equivalents ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
Life Sciences ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents
In a pivotal ruling for patent damages and standard-essential patent (SEP) litigation, the Federal Circuit vacated a $300 million award against Apple in a long-standing dispute with Optis Cellular Technology, LLC. See Optis...more
7/8/2025
/ Appeals ,
Apple ,
CAFC ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Damages ,
Evidence ,
Expert Testimony ,
FRAND ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Section 101 ,
Standard Essential Patents
In what is certain to become a landmark decision, the Federal Circuit has resolved a long-standing question that divided patent litigators and judges alike: does IPR estoppel apply to physical systems (“system art”) described...more
5/9/2025
/ Appeals ,
CAFC ,
Estoppel ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Judicial Authority ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Prior Art ,
Statutory Interpretation