As private industry and government entities increasingly venture into space, securing IP rights for space-related innovations has become a critical consideration. The global space industry is projected to generate more than...more
Defendants sued for patent infringement in district court commonly seek litigation stays based on an American Invents Act (AIA)-contested proceeding that assesses the validity of the patents-in-suit before the Patent Trial...more
When faced with allegations of patent infringement at the International Trade Commission (ITC), a respondent must quickly evaluate whether or not to request an AIA review (hereinafter, inter partes review for convenience) at...more
9/26/2018
/ § 315(b) ,
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ,
America Invents Act ,
Clear and Convincing Evidence ,
Collateral Estoppel ,
Exclusion Orders ,
Imports ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Issue Preclusion ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Motion To Stay ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter ,
Patents ,
Preponderance of the Evidence ,
Prior Art ,
Section 101 ,
Section 112 ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Time-Barred Claims ,
Written Descriptions
Stratasys asserted four of its 3D printing patents against Afinia in the U.S. District Court of Minnesota. Afinia responded by petitioning for inter partes review (IPR) of the asserted patents. Yet, Stratasys escaped...more