Latest Posts › USPTO

Share:

Once You’re In, You’re In, Amending Claims Addressing an Instituted Ground Allows for More Unrelated Amendments

AMERICAN NATIONAL v. SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION [OPINION]- PRECEDENTIAL - Before Stoll, Schall, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00497...more

The Applicant-Action (Or Inaction) Exception

GILBERT P. HYATT v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE - Before Moore, Prost, and Hughes. Appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia - Summary: For a patent application filed but not yet...more

INVENTORS, NOT AI-VENTORS: The Patent Act Requires an “Inventor” to Be a Natural Person

Before Moore, Taranto, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary: Under the Patent Act , an “inventor” must be a natural person. Therefore, an AI system cannot...more

Assignor Estoppel Does Not Preclude Reliance on Invalidity Decision

HOLOGIC, INC. v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC. Before Wallach, Clevenger, and Stoll. Appeals from the United States District Court District of Delaware. Summary: The doctrine of assignor estoppel precludes an assignor from...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide