The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requires plan fiduciaries to act prudently and loyally when making decisions about the plan. In Martin v. CareerBuilder, LLC, a federal district court held that the...more
In Lee v. Argent Trust Co., the court dismissed ERISA claims challenging an ESOP stock transaction because the plaintiff, who “fundamentally misunderstands the nature of the” ESOP transaction, did not allege that she suffered...more
8/13/2019
/ Article III ,
Class Action ,
Dismissals ,
Employee Benefits ,
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) ,
ESOP ,
Failure To State A Claim ,
Former Employee ,
Securities Transactions ,
Standing ,
Subject Matter Jurisdiction ,
Trustees
Recently, the US District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit brought by former Georgetown employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) over fees and...more
1/30/2019
/ 401k ,
403(b) Plans ,
Breach of Duty ,
Class Action ,
Defined Contribution Plans ,
Dismissals ,
Duty of Prudence ,
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) ,
Fees ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Former Employee ,
Investment Management ,
Investors ,
Mismanagement ,
Retirement Plan ,
Universities