Latest Posts › Waters of the United States

Share:

And then there was one -- The Judge in Texas joined the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in staying another challenge to EPA's "old"...

Just before the July 4th holiday, I was wondering out loud what was to be gained by having a Federal District Court decide the merits of a challenge to EPA's eighth attempt to determine the reach of the Clean Water Act. ...more

Like it or not, what is and isn't a Water of the United States is clearer, but what is and isn't a Diligent Prosecution remains...

According to a complaint filed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, the DeKalb County Wastewater Treatment Facility discharged untreated wastewater into the...more

Kudos to Kentucky, not that the 6th Circuit stay of its WOTUS challenge is going to matter very much.

Just before the July 4th holiday I was wondering what opponents to EPA's and the Army Corps of Engineers' now moribund Waters of the United States regulation hoped to gain by having a Federal District Court Judge in the Lone...more

Now that the Supreme Court has decided Sackett maybe we should leave courts out of the Clean Water Act rule making business for a...

Sam Hess of Inside EPA reports that Idaho, Texas and several NGOs are pressing a District Court Judge in the Lone Star State to decide their challenge to the Biden Administration's Waters of the United States rule on the...more

More than a month after the Supreme Court's Sackett decision, the Army Corps of Engineers still isn't open for business. What's...

Sam Hess at Inside EPA reports that the Army Corps of Engineers isn't going to begin issuing Jurisdictional Determinations until after the Environmental Protection Agency and the Corps publish yet another Waters of the United...more

At least two Supreme Court Justices think there's a limit to Congress's ability to fix the Clean Water Act

Five Justices of our nation's highest court have now provided a definition of "Waters of the United States" that will be binding on the Executive and Judicial Branches at least until Congress says otherwise.  As Justice...more

Sackett turned out exactly like we thought it would turn out. What's next?

So the Sacketts of Idaho are 2-0 in their visits to our nation's highest court and the jurisdictional reach of the Federal Clean Water Act is shorter than it has been for decades. The opinion of the majority has more in...more

EPA's Waters of the United States regulation is now the law in only 23 of our 50 United States as all eyes turn to the Supreme...

Three Judges of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals have joined Judges in North Dakota and Texas in concluding that EPA's most recent attempt to establish the jurisdictional reach of the Clean Water Act is unlikely to survive...more

Confucius said life is really simple but we insist on making it complicated. That brings us to EPA's announcement yesterday about...

While we were all patiently waiting for the United States Supreme Court's opinion (or opinions) in Sackett v. EPA, Bloomberg Environment reports that EPA has another Clean Water Act surprise. For those of you who have...more

50 years later, another President is at odds with Congress over the Clean Water Act. What's next?

Yesterday President Biden vetoed the Congressional Review Act resolution that would have repealed EPA's eighth attempt to determine the jurisdictional reach of the Clean Water Act. In 1972 Congress overrode President Nixon's...more

EPA's most recent Waters of the United States rule endures a challenge in Kentucky, at least for now.

Federal District Court Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove has dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and various industry groups challenging EPA's eighth attempt to determine the jurisdictional reach of the...more

Not so hard cases can also make bad law -- Deference to Agencies takes a hit in the Texas Waters of the United States Case

Sam Hess of Inside EPA points out that Judge Brown of Texas concluded that the United States Supreme Court's nearly forty year old precedent compelling the Judiciary to defer to Executive Branch interpretations of laws it is...more

EPA's eighth attempt to define the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act will be the law in no more than 48 of the 50 states (so...

Like I said at the beginning of the month, most of us have seen this sad movie before so it is no surprise that EPA's eighth attempt to define the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act will be the law in no more than 48 of the...more

EPA's Clean Water Act "Congressional Purpose" Chicken Roosts in South Carolina

Law360 is reporting that a Federal District Court Judge in South Carolina is allowing NGOs, including the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, to continue their Clean Water Act citizen suit against the Army Corps of...more

In defending its eighth attempt to determine the reach of the Clean Water Act, EPA offers an imaginative interpretation of "status...

EPA has now opposed the motions of the State of Kentucky and several industry groups to enjoin its eighth attempt to determine the jurisdictional reach of the Clean Water Act. Much of the content of that opposition is not...more

Waters of the United States and Winston Churchill

Sir Winston Churchill famously said "those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Of course he didn't have the nearly four decade long controversy over the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act in mind but...more

Fewer District Court Judges have been asked to vacate EPA's most recent "Waters of the United States" rule. Is that progress?

This week Sam Hess of Inside EPA asked me if I had an opinion as to why there were fewer lawsuits (so far) challenging EPA's eighth attempt to durably determine the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act than there were...more

This is no way to run a railroad or make environmental law. EPA's most recent definition of Waters of the United States heads to...

Everyone expected that EPA's eighth attempt to define the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act would end up in court. I have to admit that I was a bit surprised that two groups of plaintiffs filed their lengthy complaints...more

This Federal Court reminds us that most of the Executive Branch's environmental protection authority comes from Congress

Inside EPA is reporting this morning that a three judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has joined the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in upholding the constitutionality of the Congressional Review Act. The Act...more

Backwards, forwards, square, and round. The battle over the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act continues.

Backwards, forwards, square and round. So goes a lyric by the late great Jeff Beck who died this week. Mr. Beck wasn't writing about the decades long war over the jurisdictional reach of the Federal Clean Water Act but the...more

Harassing EPA in the Courts isn't in our interests even when an NGO like CLF or the CRWA is the Plaintiff

While many of us were focused on the 2022 elections, the Conservation Law Foundation and the Charles River Watershed Association again sued the Environmental Protection Agency because EPA isn't regulating indirect stormwater...more

The Maui in the Mountains Case is Over . . . For Now

This week a Federal Judge in Montana threw out a NGO's citizen suit against the Yellowstone Mountain Club for what the NGO claimed were unpermitted discharges of nitrogen to a Water of the United States. I wrote about this...more

The Executive Branch is racing the Supreme Court to a "stable" definition of Waters of the United States but it can't win, only...

EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers have asked the White House Office of Management and Budget to review its most recent attempt to define "Waters of the United States". That definition determines the reach of the Federal...more

EPA isn't giving up on the significant nexus test but there's already a lot of water under that bridge!

Surprising no one, lawyers for EPA and the US Army Corps of Engineers have implored the Supreme Court to affirm the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' application of Justice Kennedy's "significant nexus" test for determining the...more

EPA's Science Advisory Board says EPA's definition of Waters of the United States is supported by science but will that matter to...

A little over a month ago EPA's Science Advisory Board decided "EPA could benefit from SAB review of the science supporting [EPA's] proposed definition of Waters of the United States.” As many of you know, EPA's proposal is...more

73 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide