The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that the Medicaid Act’s any-qualified-provider provision does not confer individual rights enforceable under 42 U.S.C. §1983. This decision reverses the Fourth Circuit’s...more
6/27/2025
/ 42 U.S.C. §1983 ,
Appeals ,
Beneficiaries ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Health Care Providers ,
Health Insurance ,
Healthcare ,
Judicial Authority ,
Medicaid ,
Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic ,
Patient Access ,
Planned Parenthood ,
Reproductive Healthcare Issues ,
SCOTUS ,
State and Local Government ,
Statutory Interpretation
On September 27, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law two bills that will impact health care service plans and insurers in the state....more
On May 31, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit published an opinion in Bristol SL Holdings Inc. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co., which has significant implications for the healthcare industry.
Originally...more
The White House has finalized the new Mental Health Parity rule, which focuses on increasing access to mental health/substance use disorder treatment through nonquantitative treatment limitations (NQTL) data and reporting,...more
In a win for health care providers, on August 2, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Texas federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Texas Medical Association and LifeNet, an air ambulance company,...more
On May 31, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals published an opinion in Bristol SL Holdings, Inc. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, which has significant implications for the healthcare industry, most notably by...more
The California Court of Appeal, in a major win for managed care payors and claims administrators, affirmed a lower court decision granting summary judgment in favor of United Healthcare (United), finding that United did not...more