The Delaware Superior Court, applying Delaware law, has held that a group of D&O insurers’ counterclaims and affirmative defenses based on their policies’ interrelated wrongful acts provisions and pending and prior litigation...more
The United States District Court for the District of Utah, applying Utah law, has held that an insured v. insured exclusion barred coverage for the entirety of a “mixed” action brought by both insured and non-insured...more
A federal district court, applying Missouri law, has held that an insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify an insured because the underlying litigation alleged intentional conduct that was barred by an intentional acts...more