Stanford University applied for a U.S. patent for statistical methods of predicting haplotype phase. In 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board rejected the application as ineligible subject matter. Last week, a panel of the...more
In a precedential decision last week, the Federal Circuit held that CBS will not have to pay a $1.3 million infringement award because a podcasting patent was invalidated in an inter partes review (IPR) at the Patent Trial...more
1/20/2020
/ Audio Recording ,
CBS ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Jurisdiction ,
Jury Verdicts ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Seventh Amendment
Last week, a divided panel of the Federal Circuit extinguished Molon Motor and Coil Corporation’s hopes of going forward with a patent infringement suit against its electric motor industry competitor Nidec Motor Corporation....more
1/16/2020
/ Appeals ,
Contract Terms ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Covenant Not to Sue ,
De Novo Standard of Review ,
Exclusive Licenses ,
Integration Clauses ,
IP License ,
Merger Clause ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Summary Judgment
In a precedential decision delivered this week, the Federal Circuit shot down arguments from Appellants BTG International Limited; Janssen Biotech, Inc.; Janssen Oncology, Inc.; and Janssen Research & Development, LLC (BTG),...more
5/17/2019
/ Appeals ,
Collateral Estoppel ,
Generic Drugs ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Prior Art ,
USPTO
Venue selection has been a primary focus for the past few years in patent infringement cases. However, a recent Federal Circuit decision serves as a reminder that a court must first be found to be able to exercise personal...more
In a decision issued by the Federal Circuit on October 24, 2018, the court affirmed a finding by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that a multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment claimed in an application owned by FWP IP APS...more
Appealed PTAB decisions are generally accorded a deferential “substantial evidence” standard by the Federal Circuit. However, this deference did not prevent Ericsson from prevailing in its appeal to the Federal Circuit to...more
6/1/2018
/ Determination on Remand ,
Ericsson ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Reversal ,
Split of Authority ,
Substantial Evidence
After having its complaint for patent infringement dismissed for failure to state a claim and being denied its request to file an amended complaint in the Middle District of Georgia, Disc Disease Solutions turned to the...more
5/17/2018
/ Amended Complaints ,
Appeals ,
Claim Construction ,
Complaint Procedures ,
Dismissal With Prejudice ,
Failure To State A Claim ,
Federal Rule 12(b)(6) ,
Motion for Reconsideration ,
Motion to Amend ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pleading Standards ,
Technology Sector ,
Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standard
In an appeal from the Northern District of Florida, Voter Verified, Inc. asked the Federal Circuit to reverse the lower court’s dismissal of its patent infringement lawsuit against Election Systems & Software, LLC. ...more