The Oklahoma Supreme Court has rejected a contractor’s performance bond claim due to the lack of adequate notice to the subcontractor’s surety (see Flintco LLC v. Total Installation Management Specialists, Inc., No. 120,100...more
Court Affirms $1 Nominal Damage Award in Wind Farm Construction Dispute
The general contractor on the 60-turbine wind farm project in Good Hope, Illinois, is entitled to collect a whopping $1 on its cost-to-complete claim...more
5/23/2025
/ Appeals ,
Breach of Contract ,
Construction Contracts ,
Construction Industry ,
Construction Litigation ,
Contract Disputes ,
Damages ,
Dispute Resolution ,
General Contractors ,
Subcontractors ,
Summary Judgment
A California appeals court has upheld a $5 million award in favor of Whiting-Turner Contracting Company and against the owner of a 12-story, Virgin-brand hotel in San Francisco. Whiting-Turner agreed to construct the hotel...more
A federal court in upstate New York is permitting a subcontractor’s delay claim to proceed notwithstanding a “no damages for delay” provision in the subcontract. The case, The Pike Company, Inc. v. Tri-Krete, Ltd., involves...more
The Washington Court of Appeals recently affirmed a jury verdict and $30 million judgment for general contractor Skanska. The case involves the construction of the 41-story Nexus condominium tower in downtown Seattle. As is...more
2/5/2025
/ Appeals ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Breach of Contract ,
Construction Contracts ,
Construction Industry ,
Construction Litigation ,
Contract Disputes ,
Contract Terms ,
Evidence ,
General Contractors ,
Jury Trial ,
Litigation Strategies
An Illinois federal court ruled in favor of steel subcontractor Nucor in its contract dispute with Direct Steel. The project involved the construction of pre-engineering metal buildings for the Army Corps of Engineers. The...more
12/9/2024
/ Attorney's Fees ,
Construction Disputes ,
Construction Industry ,
Construction Litigation ,
Construction Project ,
Contract Disputes ,
Damages ,
Delays ,
Evidence ,
General Contractors ,
Subcontractors ,
Summary Judgment ,
US Army Corps of Engineers
The court in AECOM v. Flatiron is back at it issuing additional evidentiary rulings as the parties head to trial later this month. These latest rulings highlight the risk of seeking the same damages from multiple parties,...more
A Colorado federal court will allow a contractor to prove up more than $250 million in damages using the modified total cost method (see AECOM Technical Services v. Flatiron AECOM, LLC, Case No. 19-CV-2811, 2024 WL 22640 (D....more
Construction contacts often include provisions that provide for pre-determined or “liquidated” damages in the event of a breach. Such provisions can provide certainty to the parties as to the consequences of a breach and can...more
Earlier this month, the State of Washington Court of Appeals affirmed a $150 million jury verdict against subcontractors involved in the disassembly of a tower crane that collapsed in 2019. The collapse, which was caught on...more
8/11/2023
/ Appeals ,
Construction Accidents ,
Construction Cranes ,
Construction Industry ,
Construction Litigation ,
General Contractors ,
Jury Verdicts ,
Settlement ,
Subcontractors ,
Washington ,
Workplace Fatalities ,
Workplace Safety
Who said legal opinions have to be boring? Not Judge Terrence L. Michael of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, who last week issued a colorful opinion rejecting a home builder’s creative claim...more
A federal court in Louisiana last week refused to enforce a limitation of liability provision included in an extra work order holding that it was trumped by the parties’ subcontract (see Planet Construction v. Gemini...more