We previously wrote about conflicting decisions from New York federal courts on whether alleged economic damages establish Article III standing under a price premium theory in baby food toxic metals class actions. See New...more
5/30/2025
/ Appeals ,
Article III ,
California ,
Class Action ,
Consumer Protection Laws ,
Disclosure Requirements ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Food Safety ,
Omissions ,
Standing ,
Summary Judgment ,
Toxic Chemicals
In one of the most closely watched issues before the Georgia Legislature this year, Georgia law has been amended through two tort reform bills, Senate Bills 68 and 69. These bills will impact various aspects of Georgia’s...more
For the second time, a New York federal district judge denied a motion for class certification filed by caustic soda purchasers, ruling that the plaintiffs had failed to meet the predominance requirement under Federal Rule of...more