Latest Posts › Patent Infringement

Share:

Blockbuster Biologics Review | Issue 26

Welcome to our quarterly update relating to biologics and biosimilars, including post-grant and patent litigation challenges to blockbuster biologics. Since the enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more

Blockbuster Biologics - Review Issue 24

Welcome to the latest issue of Blockbuster Biologics Review, which covers the status and developments of post-grant challenges and patent litigations implicating blockbuster biologics and legislative proposals related to...more

Blockbuster Biologics Review - Issue 23

Welcome to our quarterly update relating to biologics and biosimilars, including post-grant and patent litigation challenges to blockbuster biologics. Since the enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more

Time’s Up? PTAB's Jurisdiction to Issue Post-Statutory Deadline Final Written Decision

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Collegium Pharm. Inc. addressed a unique situation in November 2023 whereby the Patent Trial and Appeal Board failed to issue its Final Written Decision...more

Blockbuster Biologics Review | Issue 21

Welcome to our quarterly update relating to biologics and biosimilars, including post-grant and patent litigation challenges to blockbuster biologics. Since the enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more

Federal Circuit: Inherency in an Obviousness Analysis

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that data obtained after an asserted patent’s priority date may be used to demonstrate what is “necessarily present” in a prior art embodiment. Although the district court...more

Federal Circuit: Finding the Safe Harbor in Drug Development's Choppy Waters

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld the district court’s denial of a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) or, alternatively, motion for a new trial, reinforcing the fine line that exists between...more

Federal Circuit: ‘Consisting Essentially of’ Risks Indefiniteness and No Intent from ANDA Label’s Permissive Use

A split Federal Circuit panel recently upheld the district court’s judgment of invalidity and noninfringement because the phrase “consisting essentially of” rendered the asserted claims indefinite and the proposed ANDA label...more

District Courts Split over Proper Patent Venue for Hatch-Waxman Act Litigation

There have been two interpretations of the “acts of infringement” language in the patent venue statute regarding ANDA submissions in Hatch-Waxman litigation....more

Apotex—Biosimilars Must Provide 180-Day Marketing Notice after FDA Approval

Apotex—Biosimilars Must Provide 180-Day Marketing Notice after FDA Approval July 06, 2016 According to the Federal Circuit, post-licensure notice 180 days before commercial marketing is mandatory for biosimilars....more

BASCOM—Federal Circuit Holds Internet Content Filtering Patent Passes Alice Test

In a Section 101 analysis under Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Intl., “[a]n inventive concept can be found in the non-conventional and non-generic arrangement of known, conventional pieces”—even if individual claim...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide