This study examines over 100 investor-State cases, which involved countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) as respondent States and were conducted under ICSID, UNCITRAL and other arbitration rules and gives a...more
A number of factors have led to a more uncertain environment for infrastructure investment globally as we move into 2022.
...more
More activity and more private actors in space means more disputes. Understand how and where those disputes will be resolved to prepare your business. Our global experts bring together multi-sectoral expertise to assess the...more
On 26 October 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) delivered its judgment in Case C‑109/20, Republic of Poland v PL Holdings S.á r.l. (PL Holdings)....more
On 2 September 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) delivered its judgment in Case C-741/19, Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC, finding that the acquisition of a claim arising...more
ICSID tribunal retains jurisdiction, rejecting Germany and European Commission’s arguments that intra-EU arbitration under ECT incompatible with EU law -
On 31 August 2018, the arbitral Tribunal hearing the claim by...more
On 6 March 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) delivered its judgment in Case C-284/16, Slovakia Republic v Achmea B.V., declaring that the investor-State arbitration provision in the bilateral...more
Potential arbitration claims arising from three acts affecting investors in natural resources projects in Tanzania
INTRODUCTION -
In July 2017, three new laws (the Acts) entered into force in Tanzania which could have...more