Executive Summary: Just when employers thought New Jersey's Supreme Court could not expand the state's whistleblower law further (as we reported last summer), the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) once again has...more
8/18/2016
/ Anti-Retaliation Provisions ,
CEPA ,
Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA) ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Hiring & Firing ,
Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) ,
NLRA ,
Preemption ,
Protected Activity ,
Retaliation ,
Section 7 ,
Summary Judgment ,
Termination ,
Unions ,
Whistleblower Protection Policies ,
Whistleblowers
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently broadened California's already expansive interest in promoting employee mobility by voiding any contract provision imposing a meaningful obstacle to a California resident's ability...more
The right to enforce a covenant not to compete may be lost when the employer first violates the terms of the same agreement, says a New York appeals court. In Fewer v. GFI Grp. Inc. et al., 124 A.D.3d 457, 2015 WL 176227...more
On February 11, 2015, New Jersey's Supreme Court formally decided an important issue left open for nearly two decades concerning New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD). In Aguas v. State of New Jersey, __ N.J. __, No....more