EYE THERAPIES, LLC v. SLAYBACK PHARMA LLC - Before Taranto, Stoll and Scarsi (sitting by designation). The patent’s prosecution history required a restrictive interpretation of the term “consisting essentially of.”...more
MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L.
Before Moore, Lourie, and Dyk. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board -
Summary: Federal Circuit confirms low bar for evidence corroborating prior inventorship...more
5/30/2023
/ Corroboration ,
Evidence ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Inventors ,
Medtronic ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents
POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED v. BRENT -
Before Prost, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board -
Summary: Affirming the Board’s decision not to terminate case remanded under Arthrex I and upholding...more
SYNQOR, INC. v. VICOR CORPORATION -
Before Dyk, Clevenger, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A finding during inter partes reexamination that two references would not be combined...more
KAKEN PHARMCEUTICAL CO., LTD., BAUSCH HEALTH COMPLAINTS INC., V. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADE MARK OFFICE -
Judges: Newman,...more