When the calendar flipped over to 2021, we all expected change from a rough 2020. For employers in California, they got change in the form of a new law that requires their immediate attention and action this spring. ...more
By now, you should all know about California’s Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court decision, which was the impetus for changing the state’s worker classification law. If you need a refresher on Dynamex and the ABC...more
Wage orders are an oft forgotten feature of the employment law landscape, but one which may trip up employers. Employers should take steps to understand what wage order applies to their business, and make sure they are in...more
Thanks to the wonders of technology, it has become increasingly easier for non-exempt employees to engage in small work-related acts, or to be “on call” for their employer, after they have “clocked out” at the end of a shift....more
Arbitration. A simple word, but one that, in the context of employment agreements, was typically a “dirty” word in the eyes of California courts. Indeed, for many years, state courts could be seen as openly hostile to...more
2/24/2015
/ Arbitration ,
AT&T Mobility v Concepcion ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Employment Contract ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Hiring & Firing ,
Iskanian v CLS Transportation ,
Mandatory Arbitration Clauses ,
Preemption ,
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ,
SCOTUS