Enzo Biochem, Inc. et al. v. Molecular Probes, Inc.
Case Number: (1:03-cv-03816-RJS) -
Judge Sullivan denied Enzo’s request to reconsider the court’s claim construction of U.S. Patent No. 5,449,767 (“Modified...more
Regeneron Pharm., Inc. v. Merus B.V.
Case Number: 1:14-cv-01650-KBF -
On March 14, 2014 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”) commenced this action against Merus B.V. (“Merus”) and Ablexis LLC...more
JobDiva, Inc. v. Monster Worldwide, Inc.
Case Number: 1:13-cv-08229-KBF -
On October 3, 2014, Judge Forrest construed terms of four JobDiva patents and one Monster patent. The JobDiva patents are...more
Judge McMahon construed terms of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,156 (“Methods and apparatuses for placing a telephone call”). The patent had previously been construed in Stanacard, LLC v. Rebtel Networks, AB, 680 F. Supp. 2d 483...more
Judge Rakoff construed the following terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,585,516 (“Method and system for computerized visual behavior analysis, training, and planning”) and its associated ’516 Patent Reexamination Certificate. ...more
JobDiva, Inc. v. Monster Worldwide, Inc.
Case Number: 1:13-cv-08229-KBF (Dkt.37) -
The court accepted the parties’ proposal to have a half-day Markman hearing for a case entailing five patents....more
Case Number: 1:13-cv-01446 (Dkt. 31) -
Judge McMahon supplemented his earlier claim construction ruling. He rejected defendant’s proposal that the world “processor” be construed to require programming according to an...more
Case Number: 1:12-cv-09077-DLC (Dkt. 90) -
Judge Cote issued claim constructions for terms in U.S. Patents Nos. 7,866,715 (“Protective vehicle cover”) and 8,047,601 (“same”), which cover devices designed to protect the...more