Latest Posts › Patents

Share:

Continue Waiting for IPR Results

Aqua Products, Inc. v. Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc. - Case Number: 1:12-cv-09342-KBF (Dkt. 34) - In light of the parties’ letter describing the inter partes review proceeding between them, which stated the PTAB...more

Judge Conti Refuses to Stay Execution of Judgment

Briese Lichttenchnik Vertriebs GmbH, et al. v. Brent Langton, et al. - Case Number: 1:09-cv09790-SC (Dkt. 505). Judge Conti, having previously awarded damages of over $950K to plaintiffs for defendants'...more

SDNY Patent Litigation Update: Vol. 1, No. 5

The New York patent litigation attorneys at Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. track the SDNY docket so you don't have to. The SDNY Patent Litigation Update provides a single-resource, monthly summary of patent...more

5/23/2014  /  Patent Litigation , Patents

Court Found Case Frivolous For Five-Year Period, But $5.3M Attorney's Fee Request Will Be Trimmed - Touchtunes Music Corp. v....

Case Number: 1:07-cv-11450-RWS (Dkt. 291) - Judge Sweet unsealed [link to tab 9] his decision of April 3, 2014 [link to tab 10] granting counterclaim defendant TouchTunes' motion for fees and expenses, but said that...more

Judge Carter Dismisses Case For Lack Of Jurisdiction - Rates Technology v. Cequel

Case Number: 1:13-cv-00011-ALC-FM (Dkt. 34) - Judge Carter dismissed Rates Technology’s complaint for infringement of two patents for lack of personal jurisdiction. The patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,425,085 (“Least cost...more

Claim Construction Supplemented By Judge McMahon - Hockeyline Inc. v. Stats LLC-CM

Case Number: 1:13-cv-01446 (Dkt. 31) - Judge McMahon supplemented his earlier claim construction ruling. He rejected defendant’s proposal that the world “processor” be construed to require programming according to an...more

Claim Construction Ruling By Judge Cote - Keystone Global LLC v. Decor Essentials Ltd et al.

Case Number: 1:12-cv-09077-DLC (Dkt. 90) - Judge Cote issued claim constructions for terms in U.S. Patents Nos. 7,866,715 (“Protective vehicle cover”) and 8,047,601 (“same”), which cover devices designed to protect the...more

Expert Who Files Patent Applications Not Barred From Receiving Confidential Information - Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Par...

Case Number: 1:12-cv-09261-TPG (Dkt. 76) - The court denied plaintiffs’ motion to bar Par’s expert Professor Midian from receiving any of their confidential information unless he agreed to a patent prosecution bar. ...more

Judge McMahon Denies Stay Pending Interlocutory Review - Medien Patent Verwaltung AG v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

Case Number: 1:10-cv-04119 (Dkt. 232) - Having previously found Deluxe liable for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,187,633 B2 (“Motion picture and anti-piracy coding”), the court denied Deluxe’s request to stay...more

Laches Ends Bifurcated Stent Patent Infringement Case - Medinol Ltd v. Cordis Corporation et al

Case Number: 1:13-cv-01408-SAS (Dkt. 64) - Having bifurcated trial of Medinol’s infringement claims against Cordis for Cordis’s Cypher and Cypher Select stents, the court found that laches presents a complete defense...more

Judge Sweet Denies Motion To Further Amend Complaint - Ferring B.V. et al. v. Allergan, Inc. et al.

Case Number: 1:12-cv-02650-RWS (Dkt. 88) - In a dispute dating from 2003 concerning the ownership of patent involving desmopressin, a synthetic hormone used to treat excessive urine production, Judge Sweet denied...more

SDNY Patent Litigation Update: Vol. 1, No. 4

The SDNY Patent Litigation Update provides a single-resource, monthly summary of patent litigation action in SDNY including complaints filed, important decisions, and trending issues. For example, last month Judge Scheindlin...more

The Other Shoe Drops

Case Number: 1:11-cv-04530 (Dkt. 121) - Judge Forest found a design patent covering fuzzy slippers to be anticipated and not infringed at summary judgment. The court had previously found the claims obvious, but the...more

Judge Sweet Orders One-Level, AEO, Protective Order

Case Number: 1:13-cv-00746-RWS (Dkt. 29) - Judge Sweet ordered that the parties adopt a protective order having one level, in which no documents may be shared with a party’s designees without a request to the producer...more

3/25/2014  /  Patents , Protective Orders
189 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide