Latest Posts › Pharmaceutical Patents

Share:

Takeda Pharms. U.S.A., Inc. v. West-ward Pharm. Corp.

Case Name: Takeda Pharms. U.S.A., Inc. v. West-ward Pharm. Corp., Civ. No. 14-1268-SLR, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65317 (D. Del. May 18, 2016) (Robinson, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Colcrys® (colchicine); U.S....more

Ferring B.V. v. Actavis, Inc.

Case Name: Ferring B.V. v. Actavis, Inc., Civil No. 15-4222 (SRC)(CLW), 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69328 (D.N.J. May 26, 2016) (Chesler, J.) - Drug Product and Patents-in-Suit: Lysteda® (tranexamic acid); U.S. Patent No....more

Reckitt Benckiser Pharms, Inc. v. Watson Labs., Inc.

Case Name: Reckitt Benckiser Pharms, Inc. v. Watson Labs., Inc., Civil No. 13-1674-RGA, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72391 (D. Del. June 3, 2016) (Andrews, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Suboxone® (buprenorphine HCl...more

In Re Bendamustine Consolidated Cases

Case Name: In Re Bendamustine Consolidated Cases, No. 13-2046-GMS, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75624 (D. Del. June 10, 2016) (Sleet, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Treanda® (bendamustine HCl); U.S. Patents Nos....more

Merck & Cie v. Watson Labs., Inc.

Case Name: Merck & Cie v. Watson Labs., Inc., 2015-2063, -2064, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8782 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2016) (Circuit Judges Dyk, Mayer, and Hughes presiding; Opinion by Mayer, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Andrews, J.)...more

Intendis GMBH et al. v. Glenmark Pharms. Inc., USA

Case Name: Intendis GMBH et al. v. Glenmark Pharms. Inc., USA, 822 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2016) (Circuit Judges Prost, Moore, and Taranto presiding; Opinion by Moore, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Robinson, J.) - Drug...more

Spectrum Pharms., Inc. v. Burwell

Case Name: Spectrum Pharms., Inc. v. Burwell, No. 15-5166, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10095 (D.C. Cir. June 3, 2016) (Circuit Judges Griffith, Cavanaugh, and Wilkins presiding; Opinion by Griffith) (Appeal from D.D.C., Lamberth,...more

Teva receives license to three patents covering oxycodone dosage forms

Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Case Number: 1:13-cv-04606-SHS; 1:14-cv-02357-SHS - Teva settled with plaintiffs in two...more

Production of prosecuting attorney’s memorandum about prior art waives privilege

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Merus B.V. Case Number: 1:14-cv-01650-KBF Judge Forrest, having determined that Regeneron’s production of a memorandum discussing prior art was a waiver of attorney-client...more

1+ year delay post-answer in counterclaiming for invalidity and non-infringement is acceptable under Rule 15

Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Grüenthal GmbH v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Barr Laboratories, Inc. Case Number: 1:12-cv-08060-TPG-GWG - Teva delayed more than one year between answering a complaint...more

Judge Griesa declines to revisit Federal Circuit’s finding that a license and settlement agreement is “clear on its face.”

Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. Case Number: 1:13-cv-03288-TPG - Defendant Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (“Roxane”) was sued by Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Endo”) when Endo learned that...more

Judge Forrest finds patentee’s claim constructions to be overly broad, and lacking specification support

Regeneron Pharm., Inc. v. Merus B.V. Case Number: 1:14-cv-01650-KBF - On March 14, 2014 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”) commenced this action against Merus B.V. (“Merus”) and Ablexis LLC...more

The Local Patent Rules regarding infringement contentions do not apply to this Hatch-Waxman case.

Kowa Company Ltd. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., et al. Case Number: 1:14-cv-02497-PAC - Defendant Mylan asked the court to apply the Local Patent Rules to the case, specifically requiring plaintiff to serve its...more

Judge Forrest: “Regeneron's position that each claim in its ‘018 Patent has a single limitation is, at the very least, odd. It is...

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Ablexis LLC - Case Number: 1:14-v-01651-KBF - Teaser: Judge Forrest: “Regeneron's position that each claim in its ‘018 Patent has a single limitation is, at the very least,...more

A second patent in a chain falls to obviousness-type double patenting challenge

The court had previously determined that The Kennedy Trust’s U.S. Patent No. 7,846,442 (the “parent patent”) was invalid for obviousness-type double patenting (“ODP”) to U.S. Patent No. 6,270,766 (“the grandparent“). At issue...more

Purgation Case Still Held Up

Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Case Number: 1:12-cv-06851-AJN (Dkt. 69) - Judge Nathan approved the parties’ proposal to maintain the case on administrative hold pending...more

SDNY Patent Litigation Update: Vol. 1, No. 4

The SDNY Patent Litigation Update provides a single-resource, monthly summary of patent litigation action in SDNY including complaints filed, important decisions, and trending issues. For example, last month Judge Scheindlin...more

117 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide