In the past several weeks the Trump Administration has taken multiple actions on tariffs, based on several different legal authorities. The landscape is shifting almost continuously, and more changes are likely coming....more
The Notice also proposes new tariffs on Chinese origin ship-to-shore (STS) cranes and cranes and parts containing Chinese components. Interested parties may submit comments in response to these proposed measures before May...more
Broad Tariff Increases Could Reshape Global Trade: The aggressive use of tariffs could create significant trade disruptions for businesses dependent on global supply chains, and pair novel use of authorities with existing...more
11/25/2024
/ Artificial Intelligence ,
CFIUS ,
China ,
Cuba ,
Dual Use Goods ,
Economic Sanctions ,
Export Controls ,
FIRRMA ,
Forced Labor ,
Foreign Investment ,
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) ,
International Trade ,
Iran ,
Jurisdiction ,
Middle East ,
Popular ,
Russia ,
Section 301 ,
Semiconductors ,
Supply Chain ,
Tariffs ,
Trade Act of 1974 ,
Trade Expansion Act of 1962 ,
United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) ,
USTR ,
Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) ,
Venezuela
On September 13, 2024 USTR announced modifications to the tariffs originally imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to pressure China to eliminate unreasonable policies and practices related to technology transfer...more
9/23/2024
/ Batteries ,
China ,
Electric Vehicles ,
Imports ,
Section 301 ,
Semiconductors ,
Supply Chain ,
Tariffs ,
Trade Relations ,
US Trade Policies ,
USTR
This past year saw a continued trend in building supply chain resiliency, as this topic has grown increasingly important following Covid-19, the conflict in Ukraine, shifting landscape on tariffs, forced labor concerns and a...more
2/23/2024
/ China ,
Customs and Border Protection ,
Export Controls ,
Forced Labor ,
Foreign Adversaries ,
Imports ,
National Security ,
Section 301 ,
Semiconductors ,
Supply Chain ,
Tariffs ,
Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA)
On Friday, March 20, 2020, in an effort to fight against the coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced that it is accepting exclusions requests to remove tariffs imposed on Chinese origin...more
On May 21, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) established a process through which U.S. stakeholders may exclude products included in List 3 from a 25% tariff imposed pursuant to the investigation of...more
Further to our prior blog post, on May 13, 2019, at the direction of President Trump, the Office of U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) published a proposed tariff list covering approximately $300 billion worth of Chinese...more
On May 9, 2019, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) issued a Federal Notice indicating that tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports would be increased from 10% to 25%. ...more
June 15, 2018 – U.S. proposes an additional 25 percent ad valorem duty on products from China (818 tariff categories) with an annual trade value of approximately $34 billion. The $34 billion action became effective on July 6,...more
“Dozens of Transactions Were Cleared” -
Contrary to popular belief, most China-U.S.deals are still getting done. Even the Trump Administration recognizes CFIUS should not close the door to investment from China. The...more
4/11/2018
/ CFIUS ,
China ,
Critical Infrastructure Sectors ,
Department of Defense (DOD) ,
Foreign Acquisitions ,
Foreign Investment ,
Mergers ,
National Security ,
Risk Assessment ,
Section 301 ,
Trade Relations ,
Trump Administration ,
USTR
Following U.S. Trade Representative’s Section 301 investigation, presidential order threatens tariff increases and restrictions on Chinese inbound investment.
Tariff rises of 25 percent proposed, including for aerospace,...more
3/26/2018
/ Antitrust Provisions ,
China ,
Foreign Acquisitions ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
National Security ,
Section 301 ,
Tariffs ,
Technology Sector ,
Trump Administration ,
USTR ,
WTO
President Trump issued a memorandum (“Memorandum”) directing his Administration to take several actions related to the investigation by the Office of U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) into China’s acts, policies, and...more
Further to our alert published on November 13, 2017 regarding whether acts, policies, and practices (“APPs”) of China related to transfer of technology, intellectual property, and innovation are actionable under Section...more
As President Trump visits China, U.S. is investigating a longstanding issue in bilateral relationship—technology transfer/intellectual property requirements—that has potential implications for trade.
U.S. business and...more
11/13/2017
/ Acquisitions ,
Anti-Monopoly ,
Bilateral Agreements ,
China ,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) ,
Cross-Border Transactions ,
Cybersecurity ,
Exports ,
Foreign Investment ,
Imports ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Licensing Rules ,
Mergers ,
Popular ,
Public Comment ,
Section 301 ,
Semiconductors ,
Source Code ,
Trade Act of 1974 ,
Trade Deficit ,
Trade Policy ,
Trump Administration ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices ,
USTR ,
WTO