JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. - Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Federal Circuit found that claims reciting a...more
TOP BRAND LLC v. COZY COMFORT CO. LLC - Before Dyk, Reyna, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Summary: Arguments presented during prosecution of a design-patent application...more
OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. APPLE INC. - Before Prost, Reyna, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Patent plaintiffs have a right to a unanimous verdict on each...more
INCYTE CORPORATION v. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. - Before Moore, Hughes, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Speculative plans for potentially infringing activity are insufficient to...more
LASHIFY, INC. V. ITC - Before Prost, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the U.S. International Trade Commission. Warehousing, quality control, distribution, sales, and marketing expenses incurred in connection with an imported...more
Conflicting expert testimony constituted substantial evidence supporting the jury’s rejection of a reverse doctrine of equivalents argument....more
Before Reyna, Cunningham and Albright. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Summary: A claim that an unpatented product feature is “patented,” “proprietary,” or “exclusive” may violate...more
Before Moore, Lourie, and Albright. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Summary: Awarding attorneys’ fees may be an abuse of discretion if the court relies on factors that should be...more
Summary: License agreements containing a lump-sum payment “based on” a royalty rate may provide reliable evidence of a reasonable royalty rate for the licensed patent. EcoFactor sued Google for patent infringement over...more
INLINE PLASTICS CORP V. LACERTA GROUP, LLC -
Before Taranto, Chen, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts....more
VIRTEK VISION INTERNATIONAL ULC, v. ASSEMBLY GUIDANCE SYSTEMS, INC., DBA ALIGNED VISION -
Before Moore, Hughes, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”)....more
IN RE CELLECT, LLC -
Before Lourie, Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Obviousness-type double patenting analyses for patents with Patent Term Adjustments are based on the...more
8/31/2023
/ Escape Clauses ,
Ex Parte ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Term Adjustment ,
Patent Term Extensions ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Terminal Disclaimer ,
USPTO
YITA LLC V. MACNEIL IP LLC -
Before Taranto, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Evidence of commercial success that relates entirely to an individual claim element that was...more
IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD. v. VALVE CORP.
Before Lourie, Clevenger, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.
Summary: The patentee has the burden of proving that...more
ADASA INC. v. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION -
Before Moore, Hughes and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.
Summary: A claim directed to a specific, hardware-based data...more
Federal Circuit Summary -
Before Prost, Bryson, and O’Malley. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
Summary: (1) To uphold a jury verdict of infringement, evidence must...more