On April 1, the California Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. LoanMe Inc. that California Penal Code Section 632.7 prohibits both parties to a communication and nonparties, such as an individual who covertly intercepts and...more
The California Supreme Court overturned the California Court of Appeals to hold that a party to a phone call can violate California Penal Code section 632.7 by recording the conversation without the consent of the other...more
• In Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., the California Supreme Court clarified the scope of the ascertainability prerequisite to class certification. The Court held that proposed classes are ascertainable if defined by objective...more
On Thursday, April 7, 2017, in McGill v. Citibank, the California Supreme Court held that a pre-dispute arbitration agreement that waives the right to seek public injunctive relief is contrary to public policy and thus...more
4/10/2017
/ Appeals ,
Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Citibank ,
Class Action ,
CLRA ,
Credit Card Agreements ,
False Advertising ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Preemption ,
Public Policy ,
Reversal ,
State and Local Government ,
Statutory Remedies ,
Statutory Rights ,
Unenforceable Contract Terms ,
Unfair Competition