JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. - Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Federal Circuit found that claims reciting a...more
COLIBRI HEART VALVE LLC v. MEDTRONIC COREVALVE, LLC - Before Taranto, Hughes, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Federal Circuit reversed a $106 million...more
Before Chen, Bryson, and Stoll. Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Federal patent laws preempted a state-law conversion claim. Inventorship was properly evaluated using a...more
INLINE PLASTICS CORP V. LACERTA GROUP, LLC -
Before Taranto, Chen, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts....more
IN RE CELLECT, LLC -
Before Lourie, Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Obviousness-type double patenting analyses for patents with Patent Term Adjustments are based on the...more
8/31/2023
/ Escape Clauses ,
Ex Parte ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Term Adjustment ,
Patent Term Extensions ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Terminal Disclaimer ,
USPTO
CUPP COMPUTING AS v. TREND MICRO INC. [OPINION] -
Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stark. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Patent Owners cannot attempt to narrow claims by disclaiming claim scope during an...more
Summary: Despite cancelling a claim prior to assignment, assignor estoppel still applied to bar invalidity defenses against a related claim because the assignor warranted the validity of the cancelled claim and the cancelled...more
APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY -
Before Moore, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The proximity of concepts in a claim may link the concepts together and affect the plain meaning...more