On August 8, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors adopted Proposals 2018-16 and 2018-17. These proposals, which arose out of the work of the Commission on College Basketball (and associated working groups), will...more
The Supreme Court of the United States has denied both the NCAA’s and plaintiffs’ petitions for certiorari in the O’Bannon case. The parties had petitioned for review of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth...more
On January 26, U.S. District Judge John Lee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted preliminary approval of a new settlement of consolidated class action litigation involving the NCAA...more
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in the O’Bannon case on September 30, 2015. This case was an appeal of the United States District Court for the Northern District...more
10/12/2015
/ Appeals ,
Athletes ,
College Athletes ,
Colleges ,
Name and Likeness ,
NCAA ,
O'Bannon v NCAA ,
Restraint of Trade ,
Scholarships ,
Sports ,
Tuition ,
Universities
After a lengthy discussion in which the Ninth Circuit ruled that the NCAA’s compensation rules are subject to scrutiny under antitrust laws, the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the District Court’s...more
Last Thursday, the NCAA announced that it had filed a notice of appeal of Judge Claudia Wilken’s August 8, 2014 decision in O’Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al. The appeal was widely anticipated as the...more