First Circuit Holds Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Software Services Provider On Claim Arising Under Federal Law Satisfies Fifth Amendment Due Process’ Minimum Contacts Requirement Because Defendant Knowingly Conducted...more
In a case of first impression, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) held in Rafferty v. Merck & Co., No. SJC-12347 (Mar. 16, 2018), that the manufacturer of a brand-name prescription drug can be liable for...more
In Wendell v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a trial court order that excluded expert testimony concerning the cause of a profoundly rare and deadly disease. The decision...more
Massachusetts Federal Court In Multi-District Litigation Holds Under Six States’ Laws That Manufacturer Of Brand-Name Pharmaceutical Is Not Liable For Injuries Caused By Generic Equivalents Whose Manufacturers Were Required...more
10/19/2017
/ Failure To Warn ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Life Sciences ,
Manufacturers ,
Medical Devices ,
Multidistrict Litigation ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Preemption ,
Safety Standards ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices ,
Warning Labels