Latest Publications

Share:

D.C. Circuit Strikes Down Key Components of FCC’s 2015 Interpretation of the TCPA

In a highly anticipated decision issued late last week, the D.C. Circuit rejected key components of the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) July 10, 2015 Declaratory Ruling on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act...more

Biometrics: California Federal Court Denies Spokeo Motion to Dismiss Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Act Case

On February 26, 2018, a California federal court denied Facebook’s motion to dismiss claims under Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act, finding the plaintiff had Article-III standing despite the absence of tangible...more

Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand Biometric Information Privacy Act Case Shows Risks of No-Injury Argument in Federal Court

Defense counsel are generally trained to remove cases to federal court, and to then seek dismissal of those cases, wherever possible. But those strategies can conflict where a defendant’s motion to dismiss argues that...more

Illinois Appellate Court Delivers Potentially Fatal Blow To “No-Injury” Lawsuits Under The Biometric Information Privacy Act

On December 21, 2017, an Illinois appellate court issued an opinion that will significantly slow down the onslaught of putative class action lawsuits filed under Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). In...more

Ninth Circuit: Loan Servicer Can Rely on Standard Notice-And-Cure Provision to Defeat Statutory Claims

On December 15, 2017, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of borrowers’ statutory claims against their loan servicer because the borrowers failed to give the servicer notice and the opportunity to take corrective action...more

12/20/2017  /  Borrowers , FDCPA , Fees , Loan Servicer , Mortgages

Second Circuit Delivers Limited Victory to Defendant Under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act and Spokeo.

On November 21, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a case under Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), finding that none of the alleged violations created a...more

Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act Spurs Similar Legislation Around the Country.

Dozens of employers have been caught off guard by the rash of class-action lawsuits recently filed in Illinois alleging violations of Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). But while Illinois was the first, it...more

Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA): A Checklist for Defendants

The rising tide of litigation under Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) shows no sign of ebbing anytime soon. No industry is immune, and here’s what companies should consider if they’ve been named as a...more

Second Circuit Set to Address Key Issues Under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act

The Second Circuit became the first U.S. Court of Appeals to wade into the rising tide of litigation under Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) when it conducted oral argument on October 26, 2017 in a BIPA...more

Bristol-Myers v. Sup. Ct.: Supreme Court Restricts Specific Jurisdiction and Limits Forum Shopping

In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Sup. Ct. of Calif., 2017 WL 2621322 (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court continued its push against forum shopping by holding that California state courts do not have specific personal jurisdiction...more

Microsoft V. Baker: Supreme Court Prohibits Plaintiffs From Manufacturing Appellate Jurisdiction Over Class-Certification Denial...

In Microsoft Corp. v. Baker, 2017 WL 2507341, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that federal circuit courts lack jurisdiction over appeals from class-certification denials (or any other interlocutory decision) taken...more

Henson v. Santander: Resolving Circuit Split, Supreme Court Holds Debt Buyer Not a Debt Collector under FDCPA

The U.S. Supreme Court in Henson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., 2017 WL 2507342, ruled that purchasing and then collecting a defaulted debt does not, standing alone, make an entity a “debt collector” as defined by the Fair...more

BNSF v. Tyrrell: Supreme Court Discourages Forum Shopping by Reaffirming Restrictive Daimler Test for General Jurisdiction

The U.S. Supreme Court in BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell, 2017 WL 2322834 (2017) made it harder for plaintiffs to sue in states where their alleged injury did not occur by reversing the Montana Supreme Court’s attempt to assert...more

Midland Funding: Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split, Holds Bankruptcy Proof of Claim for Time-Barred Debt Does Not Violate FDCPA

The U.S. Supreme Court in Midland Funding, LLC, v. Johnson, 581 U.S. ___, 2017 WL 2039159 (2017) ruled that filing a bankruptcy proof of claim on time-barred debt does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act...more

Universal Health v. Escobar: Supreme Court Affirms But Limits Implied-Certification Liability under False Claims Act

The U.S. Supreme Court in Universal Health Services v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar, 2016 WL 3317565 (June 16, 2016) unanimously endorsed the so-called “implied certification” theory of False Claims Act liability, under which a...more

Spokeo v. Robins: Supreme Court Rejects Article III Standing Based Solely on Statutory Violation

In Spokeo v. Robins, the U.S. Supreme Court (6-2) reversed the Ninth Circuit’s holding that an alleged violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act was sufficient by itself to create a case or controversy required for a...more

Ninth Circuit Rejects Mootness Where Defendant Escrows Offered Funds, Broadening Campbell-Ewald

The Ninth Circuit has answered questions left open by the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez decision by finding a putative class action was not moot even where the defendant deposited the offered funds into...more

Tyson Foods: Supreme Court Punts on Statistical Evidence and Uninjured Class Members in Class Actions

The U.S. Supreme Court largely avoided important class-certification issues and resolved Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo on narrow grounds. 2016 WL 1092414 (Mar. 22, 2016). The Court affirmed a classwide jury verdict for...more

7th Circuit: Consumers are Not Injured by the Undisclosed Sale of Personally-Identifiable Information

On November 18, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held that consumers who authorized defendants to share their personally-identifiable information (PII) with third parties were not injured when defendants...more

44 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide