In Lashify v. ITC, the Federal Circuit held that the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, which is a precondition for obtaining International Trade Commission Section 337 relief, can be satisfied with...more
In a recent order issued in the Northern District of Texas, Judge Godbey denied a Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion despite the Federal Circuit’s holding that the asserted patent was invalid as indefinite. Hyosung TNS, Inc. v....more
12/23/2019
/ Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ,
Appeals ,
Claim Construction ,
Federal Rule 12(b)(6) ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Means-Plus-Function ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
New Evidence ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Section 337
In an order recently made public, Chief Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Bullock denied Respondent Hitachi Koki USA, Limited’s motion for summary determination of non-infringement because the motion was based on an incorrect...more