Latest Posts › Shareholders

Share:

Pilule empoisonnée rétroactive : l’Alberta Securities Commission prononce une interdiction d’opérations

Introduction - Le 6 novembre 2024, l’Alberta Securities Commission (l’« ASC ») a rendu une ordonnance qui établit un précédent important relativement à l’examen des régimes de droits des actionnaires dans le sillage des...more

Alberta Securities Commission Cease-Trades Retroactive Poison Pill

Introduction - On November 6, 2024, the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) issued an order that will serve as an important precedent for the review of shareholder rights plans in the wake of the 2016 amendments to...more

Oppression in the Context of a Closely-Held Corporation: SCC Weighs In

In Mennillo v. Intramodal inc., the first oppression remedy case to reach the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) since BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, the SCC provided clarity on how the oppression remedy operates within...more

Restarting the Clock: Court of Appeal Affirms Two-Year Limitation Period for Oppression Remedy Cases

In its recent decision in Maurice v. Alles, the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that oppression remedy claims under the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA) must be commenced within the general two-year limitation period...more

SCC Rules on Impartiality and Independence of Expert Witnesses

On April 30, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co. (White Burgess), relating to courts’ assessment of the impartiality and independence of...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide