In Ames v. Ohio Dep’t of Youth Servs., No. 23-1039, 2025 WL 1583264, (U.S. June 5, 2025), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that majority group plaintiffs (in this instance, a heterosexual plaintiff) do not need to meet...more
More than a year has passed since the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in its April 2024 decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, 601 U.S. 346, 144 S. Ct. 967, 218 L. Ed. 2d 322 (2024) that employees need only...more
After a three-year pause, New York is again requiring employers to provide notice of employees’ rights under the state’s Reproductive Health Bias Law in employee handbooks....more
1/27/2025
/ Appeals ,
Compliance ,
Consent ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Employee Rights ,
Employment Discrimination ,
Employment Policies ,
Notice Requirements ,
Permanent Injunctions ,
Reproductive Healthcare Issues ,
State Labor Laws
A recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court solidified the evidentiary standard of proof for federal wage law disputes where employers seek to establish their employees are appropriately classified as exempt under the Fair...more
1/23/2025
/ Appeals ,
Department of Labor (DOL) ,
EMD Sales Inc v Carrera ,
Employment Litigation ,
Evidence ,
Exempt-Employees ,
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) ,
Federal Labor Laws ,
Misclassification ,
Over-Time ,
SCOTUS ,
Standard of Proof ,
Wage and Hour