The unanimous opinion holds that development impact fees established through the legislative process are subject to constitutional scrutiny as potential regulatory takings.
The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the...more
4/23/2024
/ Dolan v City of Tigard ,
Fifth Amendment ,
George Sheetz v County of El Dorado ,
Impact Fees ,
Just Compensation ,
Nollan v California Coastal Commission ,
Property Owners ,
Real Estate Development ,
Real Estate Investments ,
SCOTUS ,
Takings Clause
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In an unpublished opinion issued May 18, 2018, Responsible Development for Water Tank Hill v. County of San Mateo, Case No. A150883, the California...more
CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development -
In an unpublished opinion issued February 20, 2018, Advocates for Better Cmty. Dev. v. City of Palm Springs, Case No. E066193, the California Court...more
Lead agencies cannot ignore the Coastal Act’s ESHA requirements in CEQA documents and defer analysis for later Coastal Commission review.
Key Points:
..CEQA requires an EIR to identify potential environmentally...more