ENERGY HEATING, LLC v. HEAT ON-THE-FLY, LLC -
Before Moore, Prost, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota.
Summary: Enforcing a patent with knowledge that it is invalid can...more
10/18/2021
/ Appeals ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Bad Faith ,
Declaratory Judgments ,
Inequitable Conduct ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Tortious Interference ,
USPTO
YU v. APPLE -
Before Newman, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from the U. S. District Court for the N.D. California -
Summary: An apparatus claim reciting a digital camera with conventional components is patent ineligible...more
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. DROPBOX, INC.
Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Summary: A claim construed to require hardware does not...more
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. [OPINION] – PRECEDENTIAL -
Before Prost, Newman, and Moore. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware -
Summary: Evidence of inducement for...more
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE v. ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
Before Newman, Lourie, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts -
Summary: An individual who contributes “significant...more
BIOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH v. BANNER LIFE SCIENCES LLC -
Before Lourie, Moore, and Chen. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware -
Summary: If a claimed product is not the active ingredient of...more
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA v. PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP.
Before Prost, Newman, and Bryson. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) may not cancel claims on the...more
2/6/2020
/ Appeals ,
Claim Construction ,
Indefiniteness ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Remand ,
Samsung ,
Section 112
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY v. GAMON PLUS, INC.
Before Prost, Newman and Moore. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A proper primary reference can have slight differences in design if, in light of overall...more
10/1/2019
/ Appeals ,
Campbell Soup Company ,
Design Patent ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Preponderance of the Evidence ,
Prior Art ,
Section 103 ,
Vacated