SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. DROPBOX, INC.
Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Summary: A claim construed to require hardware does not...more
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA v. PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP.
Before Prost, Newman, and Bryson. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) may not cancel claims on the...more
2/6/2020
/ Appeals ,
Claim Construction ,
Indefiniteness ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Remand ,
Samsung ,
Section 112