The recent federal district court decision in Faulk Company, Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al., No. 24-cv-00609-P (N.D. Tex. 2025) significantly alters the primary mechanism used by the U.S. Department of Health and Human...more
6/23/2025
/ Affordable Care Act ,
Appeals ,
Compensation & Benefits ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) ,
Employee Benefits ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Enforcement ,
Health Insurance ,
IRS ,
Judicial Authority ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Shared Responsibility Rule ,
Statutory Interpretation ,
Tax Liability
Since its adoption the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), has required employee benefit plan sponsors to make disclosures regarding plan terms and plan expenses. The most well-known of...more
11/6/2020
/ Actual or Constructive Knowledge ,
Appeals ,
Breach of Duty ,
Department of Labor (DOL) ,
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) ,
Fiduciary ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma ,
Material Disclosures ,
Question of Fact ,
Reaffirmation ,
Retirement Plan ,
Retirement Plan Beneficiaries ,
Reversal ,
Safe Harbors ,
SCOTUS ,
Split of Authority ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Summary Judgment ,
Summary Plan Description