When a court begins its order denying class certification by lamenting the “failure to properly vet named plaintiffs” and “seeming unwillingness to promptly address issues that arise during litigation with named plaintiffs”...more
We previously wrote about conflicting decisions from New York federal courts on whether alleged economic damages establish Article III standing under a price premium theory in baby food toxic metals class actions. See New...more
5/30/2025
/ Appeals ,
Article III ,
California ,
Class Action ,
Consumer Protection Laws ,
Disclosure Requirements ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Food Safety ,
Omissions ,
Standing ,
Summary Judgment ,
Toxic Chemicals