On Aug. 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit held that exposure to ethylene oxide (EtO) constitutes a concrete, present injury sufficient for Article III standing where costs for present medical monitoring are...more
8/21/2025
/ Appellate Courts ,
Article III ,
Class Action ,
Contamination ,
Environmental Litigation ,
Hazardous Substances ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Medical Monitoring ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Standing ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure
In another step toward broader regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), on August 29, 2024, New Jersey, New Mexico, and North Carolina (the States) submitted a petition (Petition) urging the United States...more