8 Puma Biotechnology is the latest victim of standing requirements in patent cases that continue to wreak havoc on plaintiffs’ ability to recover a full measure of damages. In Puma Biotechnology, Inc. v. AstraZeneca...more
3/27/2024
/ Article III ,
AstraZeneca ,
Biotechnology ,
Damages ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Royalties ,
Settlement Agreements
Earlier this month, I previewed a Federal Circuit oral argument in In re: California Expanded Metal Products Co., No. 2023-1140, where the district court vacated a jury award of a 12 percent royalty and denied a motion for an...more
It was a tough day for opposing patent damages experts in Ecolab Inc. v. Dubois Chemicals, Inc., as Judge Andrews of the District of Delaware granted Daubert motions directed to both experts' reasonable royalty opinions.
The...more