The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court determination that a patent owner had not provided the “particularized testimony and linking argument” required to demonstrate equivalence under the...more
11/7/2024
/ Appeals ,
Claim Construction ,
Doctrine of Equivalents ,
Expert Testimony ,
Forfeiture ,
Insubstantial Differences Test ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Ownership ,
Patents ,
Summary Judgment
On cross-appeals from a granted Fed. R. of Civ. Pro. 12(c) motion on subject matter eligibility, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a patent directed to a method for “assist[ing] an investigator in...more
In the latest development in the ongoing litigation saga between competitors Sonos and Google, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the US International Trade Commission’s determination that the original...more
Addressing the issue of new claim constructions presented by a patent owner after the institution of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a petitioner is entitled...more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district court’s claim construction concerning generic independent claims that were amended after a species restriction requirement, because the district court...more