Latest Posts › Insurance Claims

Share:

Indiana Appellate Court Rejects Known Loss and Deemer Clause Defenses for the Second of Two Connected Class Actions Over Toxic...

The Indiana Court of Appeals, applying Indiana law, affirmed a trial court decision finding coverage for attorneys’ fees related to defending the second of two Taiwanese class actions relating to the same underlying toxic...more

Colorado Court of Appeals Permits COVID-19 Coverage Suit to Proceed Based on Health Care Endorsement Coverage

The Colorado Court of Appeals (Division VI), applying Colorado law, partially affirmed a trial court decision dismissing an action seeking insurance coverage for COVID‑19 related losses. Spectrum Retirement Communities, LLC...more

Ninth Circuit Affirms Ruling That Section 533 Bars Coverage for Defense Costs and Indemnity When Claims Broadly Allege Willful...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, has affirmed a district court’s determination that California Insurance Code § 533 barred indemnity and defense costs coverage for a lawsuit...more

Lending Exclusion in Bankers Professional Liability Policy Bars Coverage For Claim Alleging Financing a Ponzi Scheme

The United States District Court for the Central District of California, applying California law, has held that a lending exclusion in a bankers professional liability policy barred coverage for underlying lawsuits alleging...more

Vendor’s Demand for Payment of an Invoice Triggers Duty to Defend Under Washington Law

Applying Washington state law, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has held that an insurer had a duty to defend a demand for payment under a vendor invoice for usage fees incurred due to...more

No Coverage for Class Action Claim First Made When Asserted in Counterclaim Before Coverage Period

The United States District Court for the District of Kansas, applying Kansas law, has held that an insured is not entitled to coverage under a claims-made-and-reported policy because the tendered class action counterclaim was...more

Eighth Circuit Finds Duty to Defend Under Media Liability Policy Despite Broad Related Acts Provision

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit, applying Minnesota law, has held that a media liability insurer had a duty to defend a reseller of computer networking products against a trademark infringement...more

Second Circuit Determines Letter Threatening Litigation Constitutes a Claim First Made Prior to the Policy Period

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, applying New York law, has held that a letter asserting legal liabilities and threatening litigation constitutes a claim first made prior to the policy period. The...more

Insured v. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Brought by Both Insureds and Non-Insureds

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, applying Kentucky law, has held that a D&O policy’s insured v. insured exclusion barred coverage for a lawsuit brought by a non-insured entity and other insured persons....more

Late Notice Bars Coverage for Claim Noticed to Insurer After 60 Days of Insured’s Receipt of Claim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, has held that no coverage was available under an employment practices liability insurance policy because the insured failed to give notice...more

Insurers Owe Coverage for Settlement Despite Bump-Up Provision

Applying Delaware law, the Superior Court of the State of Delaware has held that a bump up provision did not bar coverage of a settlement that resolved claims asserting breaches of fiduciary duty. On December 4, 2019, the...more

Related Claim Provision Bars Coverage for Discrimination Claims Asserted Over a Six-Year Period

Applying Illinois law, the First District Appellate Court of Illinois has held that a related wrongful acts provision barred coverage for a series of “claims” made over the course of six years because the claims—as the...more

Claims Arising from Undisclosed Circumstances Barred by Exclusion in Application

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, applying Ohio law, has held that a warranty exclusion barred coverage for a claim arising from circumstances that were not disclosed in an insured’s application for...more

No Coverage for Claims Made Outside of Claims-Made Policy Period

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, has granted a legal professional liability insurer’s motion for summary judgment, holding that its claims-made policy did not...more

Summary Judgment Denied Where Determinations of Fact Necessary to Apply Continuous Cover and Innocent Non-Disclosure Provisions

The Superior Court of Delaware, applying Delaware law, denied an insurer's motion for summary judgment on the basis that the policy's continuous cover clause and innocent non-disclosure clause required determinations of fact....more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide